Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Riken Snow Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Riken Snow 31.
Worst position in test
3. Riken Snow 43.
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.473. Riken Snow 37.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 40.8 | - | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 37.5 | 29.4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 39,1 | - | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 39,2 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
