Segment
1. Riken Snow Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Snow vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Riken Snow 31.
Worst position in test
3. Riken Snow 43.
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Riken Snow 37.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 40.8 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 38.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Riken Snow | 39,1 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 37,4 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 39,2 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Riken Snow | 37,1 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
