Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Riken Road Performance Lowcost4. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
| # | Riken Road Performance
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Toyo Proxes CF2
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R18 | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
2. Gt Radial Fe2 16.53. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
4. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet braking
3. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - cross
3. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
4. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
