Segment
1. Riken Road Performance Lowcost2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Gt Radial Fe2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Riken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt). But when it comes to comparing Riken Road Performance and Gt Radial Fe2 , the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Riken Road Performance was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Gt Radial Fe2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the Radial Fe2 were tested.
| # | Riken Road Performance
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
