Segment
1. Riken Road Performance Lowcost2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Apollo Alnac 4G
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Riken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). The first tyre test of Riken Road Performance was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Apollo Alnac 4G first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the Alnac 4G were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Riken Road Performance
| Apollo Alnac 4G
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
