Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Radar Dimax R8 Lowcost
Comparison: Radar Dimax R8 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Radar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Radar (19%). But when it comes to comparing Radar Dimax R8 and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Radar Dimax R8 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Dimax R8 and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Radar Dimax R8
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Radar Dimax R8 | 35,1 | 36,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Radar Dimax R8 | 38 | 45,1 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
