18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Radar Dimax Alpine vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Radar Dimax Alpine /53%	Uniroyal WinterExpert /79%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%

Dimensions	R15 - R19	R13 - R20	R14 - R19	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Uniroyal WinterExpert 91

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Radar Dimax Alpine 27

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert 12x

4. Radar Dimax Alpine 6x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 5.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Radar Dimax Alpine 9.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 19.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Radar Dimax Alpine 40.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

4. Radar Dimax Alpine 25.33

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert 2025

4. Radar Dimax Alpine 2024

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory

4. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

3. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended

4. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

63.3%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

58%

Radar
Dimax Alpine

52.5%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert C

4. Radar Dimax Alpine ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Radar
Dimax Alpine

81.8%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

77.5%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

68.1%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

73.4%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

72%

Radar
Dimax Alpine

70.5%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert ?

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

4. Radar Dimax Alpine ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Radar
Dimax Alpine

80.5%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

70.8%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

65.3%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

82.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

72.4%

Radar
Dimax Alpine

38%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Radar Dimax Alpine ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Radar Dimax Alpine	39.9	28.9
Uniroyal WinterExpert	36.5	29.5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Show test details