Segment
1. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle3. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
Comparison: Radar Dimax Alpine vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.253. Radar Dimax Alpine 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory3. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 39.9 | 28.9 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36.5 | 29.5 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 37.5 | 29.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 36,8 | 30,6 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 35,0 | 30,7 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 38,1 | ||||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36,9 | 26,1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
