In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Radar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Radar (31%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 53% of the Radar Dimax Alpine. The first tyre test of Radar Dimax Alpine was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 235/35 R19 test, where both the Dimax Alpine and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTOBILD
|
Winter
|
2024 | 235/35 R19 | View |
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Radar Dimax Alpine
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.