Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Profil Tyres Prosport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Profil Tyres Prosport 2 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Profil) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Profil (0%). The first tyre test of Profil Tyres Prosport 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Tyres Prosport 2 and the WetProof were tested.
| # | Profil Tyres Prosport 2
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Profil Tyres Prosport 2 | 85,7 | 80,6 | 90,9 | ||||
| Nokian WetProof | 101,3 | 102,2 | 100,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
