Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium5. Vredestein Wintrac Premium6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle7. Premiorri ViaMaggiore Z Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Premiorri ViaMaggiore Z Plus vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Vredestein Wintrac
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good5. Vredestein Wintrac Very good6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended6. Vredestein Wintrac Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Premiorri ViaMaggiore Z Plus | 44,1 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 33,6 | 27,3 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 34,2 | 27,7 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac | 33,5 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
