Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Powertrac Snowstar Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Powertrac) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Powertrac (0%). But when it comes to comparing Powertrac Snowstar and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Powertrac Snowstar was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Snowstar and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested.
# | Powertrac Snowstar
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Powertrac Snowstar Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Powertrac Snowstar | 44 | - | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
Show test details |