Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian zLine vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
| # | Pirelli P ZERO
| Nokian zLine
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | R15 - R20 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Pirelli P ZERO 6.063. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory4. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended4. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 8,3 | 8,5 | 8,6 | 5,9 | |||
| Nokian zLine | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 9,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 141 | 58 | 50 | 16 | 8 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 149 | 63 | 47 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 263 | 133 | 130 | 13 | 9 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Highly recommended | 9,3 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 7,7 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
