Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Pirelli summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Pirelli P ZERO and Nokian zLine, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2018 225/45 R17 test, where both the P ZERO and the zLine were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 53% of Pirelli P ZERO has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian zLine has A rating. We also know where P ZERO is made - Italy.
| # | Pirelli P ZERO
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
1. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Pirelli P ZERO 6.062. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
1. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
2. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 75%
2. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 93%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
2. Nokian zLine 75%
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 8,3 | 8,5 | 8,6 | 5,9 | |||
| Nokian zLine | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 9,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 141 | 58 | 50 | 16 | 8 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 149 | 63 | 47 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 263 | 133 | 130 | 13 | 9 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Highly recommended | 9,3 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 7,7 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||