Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium3. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle4. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Lowcost
Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.643. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended3. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended4. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian WetProof Recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended4. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 35,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Nokian WetProof | 35,2 | 29,7 | |||||
| Kenda KR41 Emera A1 | 34,9 | 30,3 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
