Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
Pirelli P ZERO vs Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 is a classic head-to-head among UHP summer tyres aimed at sporty road use. The P ZERO comes from Pirelli (made in Italy) and the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 from Hankook. Both target high grip and precise handling, but their test records reveal different character strengths.
Summary of test results across 9 mutual comparisons: it’s extremely close. Hankook finished ahead in 5 out of 9 shared tests (Gute-Fahrt, ACE, Auto Motor und Sport, Sportscars, Autoexpress), showing consistent upper-midfield pace. Pirelli placed higher in 4 of 9 (Auto Bild, ADAC, GTÜ, Sportauto) and crucially delivered two test wins (Auto Bild and sport auto). Looking at overall balance, the Pirelli achieved a slightly better average ranking, while the Hankook more often edged the direct head-to-head. This means: the P ZERO brings peak performance; the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 brings consistent competitiveness.
Where Pirelli P ZERO shines: In Auto Bild, the P ZERO won thanks to standout results in dry braking, wet braking, wet handling and wet circle. ACE also highlighted it for dry driving behavior, dry braking and objective wet handling. This aligns with its reputation for immediate steering and high peak grip. It also scored strongly in ADAC (3/16) and GTÜ (4/14), and clinched the win in sport auto (1/7). The trade-off is variability: it slipped down the order in some tests (e.g., 7/10 in Gute-Fahrt and 6/9 in Sportscars), indicating its performance can depend on size, test car or test focus.
Where Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 shines: ACE praised the K117 for dry driving behavior, wet braking and notably exterior noise—pointing to a more refined, balanced setup. It regularly finished near the front (3/8 in Auto Motor und Sport, 2/9 in Sportscars, 4/11 in Autoexpress), and beat the Pirelli in more direct matchups overall. One low point was GTÜ (9/14), but otherwise the Hankook rarely put a foot wrong, making it a reliably strong all-rounder.
- Pirelli P ZERO – Key strengths: Best-in-test braking (dry and wet), excellent wet handling/cornering, sharp steering, multiple wins/podiums.
- Pirelli P ZERO – Potential drawbacks: Performance variability across tests; not always the quietest/most comfort-oriented option.
- Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 – Key strengths: Consistent placements, balanced dry/wet performance, low exterior noise, strong handling composure.
- Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 – Potential drawbacks: Fewer outright wins; one notably lower finish (GTÜ).
Which tyre is better overall? If your priority is ultimate grip and braking excellence, the Pirelli P ZERO edges it with more peak results and two victories. If you value a more consistent, refined all-round performance with competitive results in most scenarios, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 is the safer, more predictable choice. In short: Pirelli for sportiest stopping and wet prowess; Hankook for balance, noise comfort and steady scoring.
Replacement status: At the time of writing, neither model is marked as replaced by a newer tyre on our site.
Explore full specs, sizes and test details: Pirelli P ZERO and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended3. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended3. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
1. Pirelli P ZERO 100%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
10
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good + | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 141 | 58 | 50 | 16 | 8 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 146 | 65 | 46 | 15 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | ||||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | 8,6 | 8,3 | 7 | 7 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 8,8 | 8,6 | 8 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 263 | 133 | 130 | 13 | 9 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 225 | 102 | 123 | 17 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Highly recommended | 9,3 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 7,7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 8,9 | 8,8 | 7,9 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 266,5 | 187,9 | 63,2 | 96,1 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 97,3 | 297,2 | 195,1 | 71,4 | 99,8 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 97,7 | 287,2 | 191,5 | 77,9 | 100 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
