Segment
1. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 has a better rating of 90% compared to 62% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Test winner2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
