Segment
1. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 has a better rating of 94% compared to 67% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Test winner2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
