Segment
1. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Premium3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium4. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium6. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary3. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner5. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Test winner6. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended5. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 139 | 135 | 141 | ||||
| Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 138 | 130 | 125 | ||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 139 | 135 | 140 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Highly recommended | 126 | 123 | 141 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 123 | 134 | 140 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
