Segment
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Pirelli summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) has a better rating of 85% compared to 78% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the P Zero (PZ5) and the Ecsta Sport (PS72) were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings.
| # | Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R21 - R23 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Test winner2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Rating: Recommended | 133 | 60 | 54 | 19 | 14 | 5 | |
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Recommended | 131 | 62 | 49 | 20 | 15 | 5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||