Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli Cinturato P7 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Highly recommended3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended3. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 | 36,3 | 28,4 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
