Comparison: Pirelli Cinturato All Season Plus vs. Michelin CrossClimate+

The comparison between the Pirelli Cinturato All Season Plus and Michelin CrossClimate+ reveals essential insights about their performance rated by tyre tests.

Pirelli Cinturato All Season Plus, which comes from the esteemed Pirelli manufacturer, has demonstrated strong characteristics overall but still has room for improvement. The model took the 10th place in the Autobild test out of 27 participants. Its prime features as per this test include excellent dry braking, low exterior noise, and low rolling resistance, resulting in an effective and silent ride with good fuel efficiency. However, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season Plus falls short in the snow and ice performance with prolonged braking distances and understeering driving behaviour, as mentioned in the Autobild 2020 test.

On the other hand, the Michelin CrossClimate+, produced by the famed Michelin manufacturer, has excelled in several areas making it an all-around contender. It secured the 2nd position in the Autobild test, coming only one position behind the lead. The model showcased a series of strong attributes such as dry braking, exterior noise, rolling resistance, dry handling, mileage, snow handling, and price/value. Particularly noteworthy are its snow handling capabilities, a marked contrast to the Pirelli model, and the high mileage it offers. However, as per the Autobild 2020 test, it comes with a significant pricing level.

Based on these assessments, the Michelin CrossClimate+ outperforms the Pirelli Cinturato All Season Plus overall, particularly in snow handling and is better rated. However, if pricing is a central deciding factor, the Pirelli tyre may be a more suitable choice. Both are in their own right, exceptional models from their respective manufacturers and offer compelling features. Despite the main winner seems to be clear in these tests, depending on specific needs and preferences, either tyre could be a viable option.

The final verdict depends on whether the user prioritizes price-efficiency or higher snow performance, and thus, tailoring the choice to specific requirements remains crucial.