Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Michelin Agilis+ Premium3. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle4. Kleber Transpro Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER vs. Michelin Agilis+ vs. Falken Linam VAN01 vs. Kleber Transpro
| # | Pirelli CARRIER
| Michelin Agilis+
| Falken Linam VAN01
| Kleber Transpro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB2. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Kleber Transpro Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 3,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
