Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle4. Semperit Van-Life 2 Lowcost5. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER vs. Falken Linam VAN01 vs. Semperit Van-Life 2 vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Semperit Van-Life 2 Rating: Poor | 5,1 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 1,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
