Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle4. Nordexx NS9000 Lowcost
Comparison: Nordexx NS9000 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+
Table of contents:
| # | Nordexx NS9000
| Cooper Zeon CS8
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Michelin Primacy 4+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R15 - R19 | R14 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.673. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.714. Nordexx NS9000 46.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Nordexx NS9000 | 38,8 | 36,1 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 36,3 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Nordexx NS9000 | 37,9 | 43,6 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
