Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 209 | 93 | 116 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
