• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine and Yokohama Advan Sport V105, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the zLine and the Advan Sport V105 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 also have A wet ratings.

# Nokian zLine
/0%
Yokohama Advan Sport V105
/0%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Yokohama
DimensionsR16 - R21 R16 - R23
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDryWearComfortFuel consumption
Best values in test1,91,20,83,01,3
Nokian zLine
Rating: Satisfactory
2,72,22,33,52,0
Yokohama Advan Sport V105
Rating: Satisfactory
2,71,2 1,53,52,7
Show test details
GTÜ
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test2781461432510
Nokian zLine240119121229
Yokohama Advan Sport V1052099311648
Show test details