Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine and Yokohama Advan Sport V105, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the zLine and the Advan Sport V105 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
1. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 209 | 93 | 116 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||