Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
4. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Nokian zLine | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 9,0 | |||
| Toyo Proxes T1 Sport | 7,1 | 7,6 | 7,0 | 5,8 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 8,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Nokian zLine | 36,1 | 40,2 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes T1 Sport | 36,7 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 1,6 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
