Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
2. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
2. Nokian zLine 60%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
2. Nokian zLine 80%
1. Nokian zLine 93%
2. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Nokian zLine | 36,1 | 40,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||