Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine and Michelin Pilot Sport 4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2018 225/45 R17 test, where both the zLine and the Pilot Sport 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (84%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
2. Nokian zLine 20.
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended
2. Nokian zLine Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Nokian zLine | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 9,0 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 8,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||