In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine and Michelin Pilot Sport 4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2018 225/45 R17 test, where both the zLine and the Pilot Sport 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (84%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 also have A wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automotorsport
|
Summer
|
2018 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.