Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Linglong Sport Master
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Linglong (43%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
