Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended
