Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Dry braking
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
