Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Debica Presto UHP 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Debica (56%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2024 when was the Debica Presto UHP 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Debica Presto UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Debica Presto UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
