Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine SUV and Vredestein Ultrac Satin, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Satin first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the Ultrac Satin were tested.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
