Segment
1. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine SUV and Uniroyal RainSport 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the RainSport 3 were tested.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Uniroyal RainSport 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Uniroyal RainSport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
