Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine SUV and Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
