Segment
1. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda SportControl 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the SportControl 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Fulda SportControl 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Fulda SportControl 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda SportControl 2 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
