Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle3. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary3. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
