Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium3. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle4. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Fulda SportControl 2 11.69
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary4. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory3. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory4. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
