Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian zLine SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (81%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
