Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 4 and Yokohama BluEarth winter V905, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings. We also know where WR SUV 4 is made - Russian Federation.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 4
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
