Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 4 and Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 4 and the Latitude Alpin LA2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 also have C wet ratings. We also know where WR SUV 4 is made - Russian Federation.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 4
| Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||