Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Yokohama W.drive V905, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the W.drive V905 were tested.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Yokohama W.drive V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | 131 | 128 | 131 | |||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: - | 324 | 59 | 134 | 123 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||