Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Yokohama BluEarth winter V905, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
