Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Nankang (9%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Nankang Winter Activa SV-55, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2015 245/65 R17 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Winter Activa SV-55 were tested.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-55
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 | 2+ | 1- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 | 4- | 3- | 2- | 4- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
