Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has B rating.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Lateral guidance on snow
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
