Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle3. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory3. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory3. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 3+ | 3 | ||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | 35,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
