Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle4. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle4. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.073. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.255. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Barum Polaris 5 Good4. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory5. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory6. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory4. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient6. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 3+ | 3 | ||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1 | ||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | 35,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||