Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 41% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the MP93 Nordicca were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C rating. We also know where WR Snowproof is made - Finland/Russian Federation.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2022 | 215/60 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Nokian WR Snowproof
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Nokian WR Snowproof
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Nokian WR Snowproof
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Nokian WR Snowproof
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Nokian WR Snowproof
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
